LITTLE MISS GIANT (Vocalist of the Month for 1/18: Brenda Lee)

(NOTE: I’ve been working on this one for a while and now present it as, I believe, the most in-depth appreciation of Brenda Lee that exists anywhere. If, by chance, that’s true, she deserves for somebody to beat it every day from now on.)

blee38

First my story….

Back in the days when I measured my life in large part by the discovery of voices, I used to hit the good local record store every Friday after work the way other people hit bars, restaurants or movie theaters. There was a process, almost sacred. It differed from ritual only in that it involved making decisions. Lots of decisions. I like all kinds of music. Back in the days of good record stores in medium-sized towns, there were literally hundreds, perhaps thousands, of records (later CDs) I wanted to hear.

I emphasize the word “hear” because, for me, that was always the point: the actual listening experience. I didn’t care about “collecting,” never cared whether a record or disc had any qualities beyond what I was actually going to hear when I put it on the appropriate playing device. I’m not saying I was never influenced by any other factor (I love album covers for all kinds of reasons…and I’m hardly averse to a bargain), but when the last measure was being counted, on a Friday night or any other time, where I put my twenty or thirty or, at a rare extreme, fifty bucks was completely controlled by what I wanted to hear when I got home that night. If that makes me sound like a junkie, well, I can see where there’s a certain obsessional affinity. (It’s one reason I never took drugs. I recognized my vulnerabilities.)

One day in the early nineties, I came home with this:

bleealbum9

I didn’t think it was any big deal. I just thought it was time. I knew who Brenda Lee was, and by that I mean I was certain I knew who Brenda Lee was. I was born in 1960, in the south. There was no way to avoid knowing who Brenda Lee was in that time and place, and, really, no way to avoid being certain that you knew.

Okay, I didn’t really know too many of her songs. “Rockin’ Around the Christmas Tree,” was a holiday perennial. “I’m Sorry” and “Sweet Nothin’s” showed up on an oldies’ station once in a while. I even had one of her greatest hits albums on vinyl. This one as it happened:

I hadn’t bought it, just acquired it in one of those stacks of records that record junkies acquire here and there (people are forever giving away their old albums, even to this day…the only ones you never end up with are the ones you were certain you would that invariably contain that one cherished item you can never find anywhere else…oh, wait, I think I may have just gotten this confused with life).

blee12I had listened to it. Nothing went on the shelf without getting a spin. For whatever reason it hadn’t made an impression. You listen to enough records and some of them get by you. That one got by me, maybe because I was certain I knew Brenda Lee so I knew I only had to listen with half an ear.

I liked her, of course. Who didn’t? She was big. She had a lot of hits in an era when that was hard to do without being good (though, of course, it wasn’t impossible…I’ll avoid naming names).

So I knew all that when I brought that 2-CD package home on a Friday night around 1994 or so. I also knew–was certain I knew–where Brenda Lee fit. She was one of those good singers from the fifties/early sixties. One of those singers like Gene Pitney or Brook Benton or Bobby Darin who made really good records and earned a certain level of respect that went so far and no further.

By which I mean I knew–was certain–that she wasn’t important. Not truly important. Not to people like me. She was too professional. Too inside the lines. Too cautious. Maybe even too slick.

blee24Now don’t get this wrong. I expected to enjoy the Anthology, was very much looking forward to hearing it. I even thought–took it for granted really–that I would be moved by a previously unheard track or two, that there would be a few new favorites to absorb into my personal pantheon. There almost always were and just because I had Brenda Lee pegged, didn’t mean I didn’t respect her. I mean, it was the nineties. Rock and roll was dead as a door nail (just like it had first been pronounced in the days when Brenda was having her first hits with her being, by some people’s lights, exhibit A…except this time it was real, because, among other things, it was happening to me, and, of course, I turned out to have the kind of cursed luck that means when it happened to me it really, really happened!), and even if it somehow wasn’t, I still knew not to take a sixties-era hit maker for granted because the stuff they had made sound so easy had long since proved to be anything but. Hey, why do you think those Friday night decisions in the record store were so hard? How do you think I had gotten twenty years into my record buying life without having a decent Brenda Lee collection on my ever-burgeoning shelves? A treasury of riches, that’s how. Always a little more gold to mine. Just keep digging.

blee11

So the digging had finally gotten around to her. Specifically to a 2-CD set (minus box…they knocked five dollars off the price…that’s all it took!) entitled Brenda Lee Anthology: 1956-1980–surely the only Brenda I would ever need.

I bought other stuff, too. I don’t remember specifically what, but there were probably two or three other cheap CDs. The Anthology, though, was definitely the big purchase of the week, I do remember that. I remember that because it was my habit to save the big purchase for last. So the way it worked, I got myself something to eat, I puttered around, I watched part of the baseball or basketball game (whatever season it was).

I listened to the other CDs.

Then, when midnight drew near, I threw on the first CD of the Brenda Lee set.

My thinking was I could listen to a few tracks while I was getting ready for my shower (probably something similar to what I had done with that LP that got by me back when). Then, if it sounded like I might miss something important, I could pause it while I was in the shower and, if it didn’t, I could turn it up a little and keep it playing, pretty sure I would hear enough of what was going on over the stinging needles to do a playback if needed. I mean, it was the big purchase of the week but I knew Brenda Lee, had grown up with her being sort of around, heard her all my life.

I was pretty sure I could sneak in a shower.

So I listened to this while I was getting the towels out, changing into my robe…

And it was fine. Not Hank Williams (hell, she was eleven) but catchy. Then there was a another catchy one and the one after that was this one…

And I thought, “Gee, this is….something…”

Enough of something to get me to walk into where the stereo was and cinch my robe and take a seat.

Just for a song or two, you know.

Then the song or two went by and this came on…

And I thought…”What is this?” By which my subconscious meant something like “What’s happening here?”

An hour-and-a-half later, I was still sitting there in my robe, listening to this…

Thinking:

“What just happened?”

Well, by then the question was purely rhetorical. I knew what had just happened. What had just happened was I had been taken on a great journey through American music–rock and roll, country, rockabillly, R&B, the Nashville Sound, teen-pop, Tin Pan Alley–by one of its greatest singers.

And I wasn’t entirely happy about it.

Oh, I was happy about the music. Ecstatic in fact. Lifted in the way that only the discovery (or in this case, comprehension) of a great new voice could lift somebody who spent as much of his life searching for voices as I did.

But the ecstasy was cut, seriously, by anger.

I was angry at the people who had lied to me, who had managed to render somebody I had known all my life literally invisible, to somehow shove her out of reach, past what I had previously considered my very keen hearing.

And it was then–right then–that I began developing my Unified Theory of Rock Criticism as a specific conspiracy designed to drop Brenda Lee down the memory hole.

It took me about ten minutes to develop that theory. I’m still working out how I feel about it. Which is maybe why I put Brenda Lee’s picture at the top of my blog the day it started and waited six years to write about her.

I’m still working through my issues.

But this is a celebration of Brenda Lee, so I’m not planning to work through them here. What I’m planning to do here is place Brenda Lee in rock and roll history the way I hear it.

And the best way to do that is to leave my story alone and tell hers…

blee1

First her life, then her art.

Her life went more or less like this….

She was born in 1944. Her family was literally dirt poor, moving constantly in and around the dirt hills of northeast Georgia. She was singing for candy in local stores at three, on what passed for the local stages at five, on local radio not long after. When her father died in 1953, she instantly became the family’s principal breadwinner, a journey that took her to radio stations in Ohio, Kentucky and, eventually, a local show where, upon hearing the voice John Lennon would later allegedly pronounce “the greatest rock and roll voice of them all,” Red Foley got “cold chills,” watched her get three encores, and signed her up for the Ozark Mountain Jubilee.

Soon she was commuting from north Georgia to southern Missouri every weekend, leaving Friday afternoon for a fifteen-hour ride with whoever was going, telling jokes to keep the drivers awake, performing live Saturday night in settings like this one….

Then returning on Sunday, arriving home Monday in the wee hours, just in time for school

More Mondays than not, her head hit the desk before lunch time. Her teachers let her sleep.

The hard-won professionalism that would, in part, keep several generations of critics, programmed to prize what they deemed “spontaneity” as the only true form of “authenticity,” from understanding her, paid off with a Nashville contract (Decca/MCA)  in 1955.

Then the real work began. How to sell an eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen-year-old girl who looked half her age to either a hard-bitten country audience that had never accepted anyone her age before, or a rock and roll audience that Nashville was scared to death of–and, despite a few hits for Frankie Lymon and Arlene Smith’s Chantels, hadn’t made anybody that young a major star either. One hit wonders of the type that proliferated throughout rock’s early dawn were virtually unheard of in country at any age. In Nashville, they were looking to build careers.

But, in order to build a career, you had to have a hit to build it on. Somewhere, some time. You can stand around and look cute. You can even go to Vegas…blee30

You can carry your family on your back, touring from town to town. You can sign with a one artist manager (just like Elvis!) who makes you the first truly international rock and roll touring star while Nashville’s A Team and crackest of crack producers (Owen Bradley), is still trying to figure out where you fit. You can smart talk the ace session men (“well goo-goo to you, too” she said, on the guar-an-teed last occasion when anybody talked down to her) and get everybody who knows you personally to love you enough that you’ll be something like the biggest star nobody ever said a bad word about…if you can only find a hit that makes you a star to begin with. Something more than a touring sensation. Something more than a girl the French make up stories about (“she’s really a thirty-year-old midget!”…that made more sense than the truth of that voice coming from a four-foot-nothing thirteen-year-old).

It must have been the longest four years anyone ever lived while, in some senses, having it so good. She was everybody’s baby. She was making a living. She was even already “Little Miss Dynamite” as great an earned nickname as anybody ever had or ever will.

She just wasn’t a hit-maker.

It must have been extraordinarily frustrating–to hear dozens (or hundreds) who weren’t as good as you have hits, even strings of hits, in and out of Nashville. Even for someone who had once moved eight times in nine years, seen her daddy die of old age in his forties (like so many then), carried her family on her tiny back for nearly a decade at the ripe old age of fifteen without achieving anything like the Shirley Temple/Judy Garland level of promised success that must have been whispered in her ear by managers, talent scouts, record producers, know-it-alls, know-nothings, from the time she was big enough to stand on the box that let her reach the microphone.

blee33

The only picture I could find of Brenda with Patsy Cline

Frustrating all the more because she must have known she was already so much more than a pro. Being a pro was important, sure, but it only gets anyone so far. If you are being mistaken for a female midget, it may not get you as far as it does some others. And, without a hit, the greatest mentors and finest friends can’t keep you afloat forever.

Frustrating because, on top of everything else, you’ve managed to get better and better, to build, step by painful step, something authentically new in American music, the blend of Hank Williams, Mahalia Jackson and Judy Garland you, and you alone, aimed for. Hard to do all that, and still get taken for a little girl.

Harder still if even this can’t bring you a hit (it didn’t get big until after she did)…

..and the specific style you’ve been groomed for, rockabilly, is beginning to fade. One day, you look around and Elvis is in the army, Jerry Lee’s in trouble for cousin-marryin’ (surprise, surprise), Buddy Holly just went down in a plane crash. Roy Orbison is thinking about how to get away from Sam Phillips. Charlie Rich is doing the same. And you?

…Then the Art

Well, you’ve been on a major label for nearly four years without cracking the Hot 100.

And, oh by the way, the word has gone out.

If you do, by chance, get a pop hit, Nashville won’t let any country stations play it. It’s not 1956 anymore. The world has moved on. They had shut out the Louisiana Hayride. They had shut out Elvis and the Everly Brothers. They had kept the colored people out.

Best behave.

Actually, that last part was sort of okay. She did behave. Maybe she didn’t quite always behave just exactly like the book said (and wouldn’t you like to get a peek at that book, the one you know is still somewhere in Nashville, locked away, consulted only on high holy occasions, its location and provenance known only to the few?) when she opened her mouth to sing, but, hey, that’s a chance you sometimes have to take. Does it matter really, where the records get sold? The profits come back to the same office don’t they, whether the next release takes off in Pittsburgh or Winnemucca….or Tokyo?

It could have gone on a while longer, the speculation about whether she would finally make it. Maybe not much longer. Certainly not forever. Even Nashville loses patience at some point. They lost patience with plenty of people, before and since, who had fewer shots at making it than Brenda did. Some of them were even big talents.

But maybe not quite as big a talent as she was. It wasn’t her professionalism or her toughness or her beyond-her-years ladylike demeanor that won her all that patience–seven singles in three years that combined for exactly one week on the country charts and zero weeks in the Top 40. It was her voice. Her voice and, I suspect, a general sense that the voice wasn’t the problem, that it couldn’t really miss if it was given the right setting.

What that setting was, nobody knew. We shouldn’t forget that. We shouldn’t forget what we have forgotten in the nearly six decades since, the decades that have brought us a long string of what I like to call Brenda’s Children, a line that, sticking only to white women and the most obvious, runs directly from Jackie DeShannon to Lulu to Tanya Tucker to Stevie Nicks to Sheryl Crow to Pink and whoever comes next, casting a shadow the meanwhile on every single woman who has sung any sort of rock, country or southern inflected R&B.

We shouldn’t forget that Brenda Mae Tarpley made herself up out of Hank Williams and Mahalia Jackson and Judy Garland and that nobody before her sounded like her. We shouldn’t forget that, having heard that voice in literally hundreds of different throats since, we can take its place in the American soundscape for granted only because it was one of those voices that, when it did appear, made everybody go, “Well, of course,” and believe they must have heard it all their lives because it’s that kind of voice. I mean, a sound like that, what would keep it from existing in our national consciousness before, say, 1959?

Lots of things, actually. Musical things, cultural things, socio-political things. All that plus the absence, until the right moment, of an imagination sufficient to the task of calling the future into being.

If you are thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, well-behaved, mistaken for a midget, a freak of “nature,” not interested in songwriting, most of all a girl-l-l-l-l, then you are not likely to be given credit for all that. Not even if, through all the sweat, all the grind, all the learning, you find your way, at last, to this…

…and make it sound as natural as breathing.

After that, the floodgates.

For one hot minute, she was alone. Then the minute passed–lightning quick, as rock and roll time demanded back then–and her imitators were everywhere. There was a reason I was ready for her all those years later in my apartment, stuck in my chair as if I were paralyzed, as if I had lost every sense but my hearing. I was ready because “Oh Me, Oh My” and “Put a Little Love in Your Heart’ and “Landslide” and “Delta Dawn” and a hundred others had made me ready, ready to say “Oh, that’s where all that came from,” ready to go searching for where she had come from, a search that still goes on, because, if she came from anywhere, (even Edith Piaf, as some insist), it’s not likely she came from there anywhere near as directly as all those others came from her.

So the stardom everybody had predicted came at last.

And it came because she had put the essential rasp in the future of white women singing rock and roll.

And because she was a pro’s pro.

And then?

Well, she still had a life to live.

Like so much else, she didn’t live it the way anybody expected.

Chaperoned on dates until she was eighteen, she eloped with the first man she dated alone, (eloped so that her mother and her manager wouldn’t have a chance to talk her out of it). She had two kids. She left the road for a bit to raise them. She saw the British Invasion coming before anyone else. (But boys, where do you get these songs? she asked two lads whose band was opening for her on a German tour. John Lennon and Paul McCartney looked at each other and said, Well. We wrote them….. Oh my, she said. A lot of people would later claim they said something similar, but she was the only one who went home and told her record company they would be fools if they didn’t sign that band at once. It didn’t matter what kind of performers they were, the songs would be worth a fortune. The record company scoffed at her. I’m certain she was too much of a lady to ever remind them, after what she knew was bound to happen happened.)

What was bound to happen took as much out her career as anyone’s. She would always say she never changed, the world just turned. Right enough.

Because it was all more or less there from the beginning. It was there, not so much because she wasn’t forever polishing her style, but because the quality that marked her off even more than her remarkable timbre was the artist’s consummate empathy.

I’ll share what I’ve lived, her voice would always say.

And I’ll share what you’ve lived.

It was that last that made her a giant. It was why she could exemplify the rock and roll audience more deeply than anyone else, even though she had grown up as far inside Show Biz as Ricky Nelson (the only other major early rock icon who had grown up in Show Biz at all). The efforts her family–and, lest we forget, her culture–made to make sure she kept her feet on the ground, made a perfect fit with her nature. She was the little girl with the big voice and she was Little Miss Dynamite.

She was also every-teen.

She wasn’t chaperoned on dates when she was sixteen because she was selling millions of records. She was chaperoned because, in the world she came from, that was what you did. (It was the last moment when many did, but it was still what you did.)

She sold “Let’s Jump the Broomstick”–marriage as an act of rebellion–because that’s what she imagined others doing. A few years later she eloped.

But it wasn’t a simple matter of wish-fulfillment. Nobody could have sustained a career like hers on that.

She would learn–in the process of becoming the highest charting female act of the 1960s (trailing only Elvis, The Beatles, and, in some counts, Ray Charles)–to summon feelings no one would wish for.

She would learn to do it so well–to imagine herself in our shoes so thoroughly–that some of us would never wish for anyone else to take her place.

She would do that despite living no part of it herself. She would do it despite remaining happily married for life to the first man she ever dated without a chaperone.

And she would do it over and over again–wring every last ache out of the ballads that made her the Queen of Heartbreak:

…all defining (and being defined by) a sensibility that ended up in the same place, no matter which angle she started from…

Then the times changed and she woke up one day to find that her one-act manager had passed away, left her–a massive touring star who was the best selling female act of her era–in possession of her husband, those two kids, twenty thousand dollars and the deed to a split level ranch house. She made her husband-for-life her manager and determined not the repeat the mistake. That led to a fine second career on the country charts which finally welcomed her when she could no longer go pop. Somewhere down the line–some time after I had my epiphany, the honors came. The Halls of Fame (she’s one of four acts who is in both the Rock and Roll and Country Halls as a performer–the others are Elvis Presley, Johnny Cash and the Everly Brothers….you  may have heard of them) came calling, better late than never. The inevitable embalming in Branson. The late career retrospectives and fond reminiscences.

And the secret tribute from the air, where her voice is still the foundation of a hundred others who may never have heard her or even of her. Now, they swaddle those voices in walls of suit-approved, machine-generated white noise, but, if you strip all that away, it’s still her voice at the core. You might call it the Other voice.

Because the great voices come in two kinds: those that can be readily imitated (even if never quite matched) and those that can’t.

Call it the Brenda Lee/Patsy Cline Paradigm.

Patsy’s influence is almost entirely inspirational because nobody can quite get in her space.

Same for Billie Holiday. Same for Janis Joplin.

Brenda Lee? Well, gee, lots of people sound like her, don’t they? Lots of people get in her space.

Sure they do.

And because of that, we’re prone to assume she just came from the air. That if she hadn’t conjured whatever she conjured, somebody else would have.

That’s how she gets dropped down the memory hole and also why she can never quite remain buried.

The air works like that.

Too many end up owing you too much. As long as anyone, anywhere wants to dig a little deeper–and as long as there’s air to breathe, someone will–it’s always you they’ll find at the root.

Brenda Mae Tarpley may have only grown to four-foot nothing.

But she didn’t know how to be small.

Little Miss Giant she was….

Little Miss Giant she remains.

6 thoughts on “LITTLE MISS GIANT (Vocalist of the Month for 1/18: Brenda Lee)

  1. NDJ

    When I inherited the Legendary Aunt Judy Collection of 45s way way back in the pre-Devonian Era, among the boxes of records by Elvis and Ricky and Fats and Chuck and the Platters and Little Richard and Pat, there was a stack of Benda Lee singles. The big hits of the early ’60s.

    So I grew up listening to Ms Lee, both at home and on the radio, where those same hits were played regularly on the newly emerging “golden oldies” radio. But even before the British Invasion, her carer as a pop hitmaker had petered out. She would not become a successful country artist for ten years.

    And yes, somewhere along the line she was forgotten, but not as forgotten as quickly as you and I think:

    “Brenda Lee was the best white female rock singer of the Fifties. Such hits as ‘Sweet Nothin’s,’ ‘Dum Dum,’ ‘Rockin’ Around the Christmas Tree,’ ‘and ‘I’m Sorry’ were as tough, if as sentimental, as the best of any male rock & roller, and far beyond the capacity of any of her peers (with the possible exception of Wanda Jackson.)”

    Dave Marsh, THE NEW ROLLING STONE RECORD GUIDE (1983)

    Keep on keepin’ on!

    EDN

    • Marsh did not, however, see fit to include even one Brenda Lee single in his list of the 1,001 greatest (out only a few years later). Nor could
      Greil Marcus find any room for her on his Treasure Island in Stranded (1979). Nor has Robert Christgau ever reviewed a single one of her albums (let alone recommended one). In the Rolling Stone Illustrated History of Rock and Roll (I had the 1981 version), she had two lines. (Jackie Wilson had a chapter…I once wrote a long letter to Marsh outlining the strong, rather remarkable, parallels between Jackie’s career and Brenda’s–parallel in every sense except critical recognition of the type I just detailed…he sent me a signed copy of 1,001 Greatest Rock and Soul Singles, which I still have.) And it took sixteen years to put her in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, by which time every single male performer who could have been called a peer in terms of popularity, skill or influence was in…most of them long since (Jackie had, deservedly, gone in with the class of 1987, the second year.)

      I actually had all that in the piece at one time, but darn it, I’m trying to make these things shorter!

      I still ended up with 4,000 words. I’d like to think somebody’s written something as long somewhere…but if they have I haven’t come across it (I’m not counting her autobiography). And brother, I’ve looked.

      But the real tell is that, coming along a generation late and depending on critics to be my guide (this stuff sure wasn’t on the radio where I lived), she snuck up on me…and Dave and Greil and Robert shouldn’t have let that happen. I mean, nobody ELSE snuck up on me. Not like THAT. I bought dozens, maybe hundreds, of albums on Marsh’s recommendations. As recs go, “The best white female rock singer of the Fifties” didn’t exactly set my soul on fire. I think he should have sold her a little harder, even if the comps in print at that time didn’t do her justice. It just felt like damnation with faint praise.

      Anyway, it’s out of my system now….maybe I should have gone with 6,000 words and got it all in. But that might have taken another year! I hope I’ve learned not to let the perfect be the enemy of the good. We shall see!

      jwr

  2. At last, you’ve written about the subject of your website’s frontispiece. And talk about nailing it to the door!

    Brenda-related Observations of the Century so far: “If she came from anywhere…it’s not likely she came from there anywhere near as directly as all those others came from her.”

    (Amen!)

    and

    “Having heard that voice in literally hundreds of different throats since, we can take its place in the American soundscape for granted only because it was one of those voices that, when it did appear, made everybody go, ‘Well, of course.'”

    This website — too insightful and original, in my opinion, to be called a mere web log / “blog,” even if you disagree, given your typical modesty — is vital because it brings to the surface, and casts long absent and highly illuminating sunlight upon, those who have been buried alive.

    Even if the buried have been good sports about it through the decades, you’re not willing to let so much slide, thank goodness. As a persuasive soundtrack for the text, melodies are deftly conjured to ring in your readers’ ears.

    In the past, I’ve always thought that my contempt for “critics” sprang exclusively from the fact that they often think they’re important, and that others will actually go along with this illusion, when in fact they’ve never been able to affect anything, really. They can’t change the music itself (obviously) and can’t change one’s tastes, no matter how attentively the reader reads. If I were to write an article for Rolling Overrated Stoners, urging you to stop eating a food that’s one of your favorites, or to enjoy a food that makes you gag, my words would have no effect, or certainly shouldn’t. One’s taste in music is just as personal.

    Some “critics” know all of that, deep down — so there’s always a frustrated, desperate-smelling, more-cynical-than-thou miasma around their words.

    “You can’t get the sound from a story in a magazine.” It’s all about the sounds coming out of the speakers and how they move or excite the listener, or don’t — i.e. whether or not that music feels good for him, individually, to listen to. Whether or not it tastes good to his ears. Anything beyond that is mere sociological imposition. (Impressionable folks / teens / overgrown teens don’t figure into this aesthetically idealistic paragraph.)

    Besides, anyone self-loathing enough to call himself a “critic” shouldn’t draw anyone’s attention.

    So I thought that was the reason, multi-faceted as it might be, for which the very idea of “reviews” about anyone’s art, anyone’s personal expression, struck me as strange at best, useless otherwise, since I was young enough to understand the concept. When I began to read your articles and essays in the springtime of last year, I found myself gradually educated about another good reason for eschewing “critics”: The Narrative picks and chooses those who consistently remain championed, discussed and given their due in terms of influence, and those who don’t, just as strictly as a top-forty radio station picks and chooses its programmed, incessantly repeated “hits” for heavy rotation.

    Why? It can’t just be that Brenda, Mary Weiss, Arlene Smith, etc. etc. are women. The constant references to Janis Joplin, Patti Smith, and on and on seem to negate that idea. Men whose music deserve more sunlight than they’ve gotten in decades, such as, for instance, Arthur Alexander, Gene Pitney, Frank Zappa, nearly the entire ’70s Philly sound, etc., are just as buried. Even Elvis Presley is derailed as a lucky, black-copying showman.

    What gives? Simply the agenda incestuously defending its own history-as-written since the first wordy music rags appeared in the ’60s?

    Like some of Brenda’s early singles, the occasional Sly Stone song or “He’s a Rebel” or “Remember (Walking in the Sand)” might pop up once in a while, but how many self-professed rock & roll fans really listen? How many really let the music in and observe what’s happening to their nervous systems and their heart rates? How many ask each other, “Do you realize exactly what’s going on here? That nobody else could ever have possibly sung this like this? That it took conscious decisions to break molds, to be oneself, to be distinctive?”

    We’ve previously discussed your spot-on observation of singing as part of the creative process, just as important as any other element. In many cases, I’ve found Brenda’s creativity to exceed that of the people who actually wrote her songs.

    “Her voice is still the foundation of a hundred others who may never have heard her or even OF her.” Spiderweb influence — like Mary, like Arlene, like dozens of other names that you and I could trade until tomorrow’s sun rises.

    What gives? Why are the real pioneers buried alive?

    I’ll close this verbose reaction to your great article with a favorite quote:

    Critics are men who watch the battle from a high place, then come down and shoot the survivors. (Ernest Hemingway)

    • Thanks Chris. I like hearing I’m insightful and original, since those are the two qualities I strive for above all others!

      I’m happy to be a blogger, though, because it’s a great format for anyone who wants to think outside the box (never mind that few actually take advantage of this…it’s work, believe me, and I understand why few want to make the effort for no pay). I think of it as a Godsend and wish I’d started at it years earlier, before the other “social media” siphoned off so much of the audience. Twitter and Facebook aren’t really the places to have these kind of discussions!

      On critics: On some level I sympathize with those who do it for a living and there are some really good ones (David Cantwell, who’s a friend of the blog, comes to mind). They write under enormous restrictions: deadlines, word counts, editorial oversight, that I don’t have to worry about.

      But, as we all know, the biggest names have ENORMOUS influence and those restrictions almost beg for a Narrative. I basically started the blog for a few reasons and pushing back against those instances where I thought they (the bulk of those who wrote for Rolling Stone and the Voice and even Creem in the days when the Narrative was being formed) got it dead wrong. I’ve got my own theories about why they got it wrong, but what I really wanted to do was challenge the assumptions, which remain almost impossible to dislodge: Writers over Singers, Men over Women, Brits over Americans, Whites over Blacks (unless one wants to polish one’s racial cred, which usually amounts to something like ARETHA IS THE GREATEST SINGER EVER. PERIOD!….almost anyone who makes this statement is hard pressed to say Why, which I find odd, because Aretha has a good case. Which they know. Which is why they feel SAFE–not to mention SMUG–making that particular argument and daring you to oppose them. Suffice it to say, I don’t think anyone should feel that safe, let alone that smug, about anything that could be called an opinion.)

      And, last but not least, there is Rock is greater than Pop (which, after 1960’s Ballad Revolution, of which Brenda was a huge part and about which I really need to write a long post someday, was a meaningless distinction anyway).

      And, of course, this style of argument–where Polemics are greater than Reason (or worse, accepted AS reason)–has bled over into Politics, Sports, even History itself, so its not without consequence. Pretty much any Twitter feed confirms the damage done. They’re all shout factories, where everyone who agrees with me is a genius and everyone who disagrees a dunce (who, thanks to instablock, I don’t have to listen to, even for 140 characters!)

      Ah, well. All any of us can do is fight the good fight with whatever tools we have. Like I say, I’m just glad to finally have a voice, even in the wilderness. After all, the voices don’t always stay there–the real Rock and Roll Narrative is the proof (hahahahahaha!)

      JWR

  3. Indeed: “Everyone is dumb…except me. And those who agree with me.” The Internet, and especially the so-called social networks, have really allowed us to see ourselves. Talk about the Western World feeding itself a big dose of self-loathing.

    We agree that making a distinction between “pop” and “rock” is fruitless. I don’t even perceive a difference between art and entertainment. When the definition of something is entirely subjective (like, for instance, “genius” or “home”), why bother applying the term at all? Nothing is really being communicated.

    Challenging assumptions you’ve certainly done! And BRAVO, at that!

  4. Well, we all need a reason to get up in the morning. The day mine is “Let’s see how many people I can get to agree with me about everything” I think I’ll just lie there and sleep!

    Thanks for the kind words Chris….Ya’ll keep me going!

Leave a Reply